[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Re[2]: package proposal
- From: Jamie Webb <j@...>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:43:42 +0100
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 12:47:33AM +0300, Asko Kauppi wrote:
>
> The source approach (if hidden well, like Fink and Gentoo do it) would
> work well, especially since luac-compiled code is highly version
> dependent. If modules use it (and are binary distributed), they very
> much themselves to a certain version.
Yeah, that's fine for Lua sources, but I'm not sure how well it would
work for C. Perl is very much a UNIX thing, and Lua much less so, I
believe. I've never tried CPAN under Windows, but I'm guessing it must
require Cygwin for that? Seems like a Lua solution should work well
regardless of the development environment. That probably means
providing three options:
1) Grab a binary if one is available for your system
2) Build using UNIX tools (and maybe have a go at VC++?)
3) Externalise the sources for a self-build (also desirable for
people who want to link statically).
-- Jamie Webb