Re: Re[2]: package proposal

[Asko Kauppi <asko.kauppi@...>]

The source approach (if hidden well, like Fink and Gentoo do it) would 
work well, especially since luac-compiled code is highly version 
dependent.  If modules use it (and are binary distributed), they very 
much themselves to a certain version.

-ak


21.9.2004 kello 22:03, Gunnar Zötl kirjoitti:

 Hi there,
> AK> That is, what's our CPAN and how modules are packaged, tied 
> together
> AK> etc.
>
> this is a very interesting discussion. While we're at it, I like the
> perl approach of distributing C- or C++-modules in source form, and
> supporting a unified environment to build them. Considering that lua
> is primarily a language meant for embedding into applications, I feel
> it would be a good thing, especially if one could choose to build
> either static or dynamic versions of such a module.
>
> just food for thought,
>
> Gunnar