Dll namings

[Asko Kauppi <asko.kauppi@...>]

And then there's LuaX, of course, which doesn't need the DLL approach 
at all. :)

(Just had to tease you, over and out... ;)


23.8.2004 kello 14:43, Daniel Quintela kirjoitti:

 Peter Loveday escribió:
> > Ah good, another standard for Lua DLL naming for modules, 
> > "LUA+LIB.DLL". Just what the Lua community needs :)
>
>
> Sorry, I use Philippe Lhoste's VC projects since Lua 4.0, and I am 
> very comfortable with it. :-(
> But you are right, Lua.dll + LuaLib.dll, or Lua+Lib.dll, or even 
> Lua50dll.dll ( from wxLua distribution), is a mess.
> Can be possible to define a "standard distribution" naming ?
> People could expect any package to depend of the same DLL's, at least 
> for testing/evaluation purpose.
>
> Thanks Peter,
> Daniel