lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Natanael Copa <> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:42 AM, steve donovan
> <> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Natanael Copa <> wrote:
>>> fwiw, luaposix is maintained. lposix is not or luaposix would never
>>> existed in first place.
>> That's the impression I get, and perhaps we should try to prefer
>> luaposix over lposix for this reason...
>> (It's the one packaged in Debian, for instance.)
>> Does Luiz have any comment to make on this?

Does any module require lposix specifically (ie, being dependent on
lposix and incompatible with luaposix)? Would anyone mind if it was
removed from the LuaRocks repository?

-- Hisham