lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Natanael Copa <> wrote:
> fwiw, luaposix is maintained. lposix is not or luaposix would never
> existed in first place.

That's the impression I get, and perhaps we should try to prefer
luaposix over lposix for this reason...

(It's the one packaged in Debian, for instance.)

Does Luiz have any comment to make on this?

steve d