[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion)
- From: Sergey Zakharchenko <doublef.mobile@...>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:55:08 +0300
Dirk,
> The only [1] place in Lua where syntax sugar saves you one statement is
How about
a():b()
vs
local dummy=a();dummy.b(dummy) ?
Best regards,
--
DoubleF
- References:
- Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion), Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion), Dirk Laurie
- Re: Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion), Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion), Dirk Laurie
- Re: Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion), Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion), Dirk Laurie
- Re: Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion), Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion), Sean Conner
- Re: Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion), dyngeccetor8
- Re: Say No to global-by-default (summary of the discussion), Dirk Laurie
