Re: Name for Windows Binary Project. Was: Re: [ANN] https://github.com/PUC-Lua

[KHMan <keinhong@...>]

On 1/19/2018 2:27 PM, Russell Haley wrote:
[snipped everything else]
> I'm glad the name is sticking. I created a logo (which I hope will be
> replaced!).
>
> https://github.com/WinLua
>
> For clarity,
>
> The project name would be WinLua, the current output would be the
> WinLua Installer. The "Installed Product" would be Lua XX Bit. The
> "Manufacturer" of the "Installed Product" is PUC-Rio and the Kepler
> Project (lfs). The license of the "Installed Product" is MIT. The
> license of the installer is er... I think I'll relent and make it MIT
> (Not FreeBSD. Sad face).

No, YOU are the manufacturer. Don't bring PUC-Rio into this. They 
are not responsible for anything you do. An end user should be 
asking questions from you, not PUC-Rio. I also think the Kepler 
project is also not responsible for anything, unless something was 
explicitly agreed upon.

Although it is appropriate to acknowledge the origin of Lua and 
such, IMHO PUC-Rio should not be construed in any way as the 
'manufacturer' of the software to be installed. Also, it has been 
discussed that "PUC-Rio" is not specific enough, it's an entire U.

If you are not clear about this sort of thing, seek help.

--
Cheers,
Kein-Hong Man (esq.)
Selangor, Malaysia