Re: explicit mode

["Soni L." <fakedme@...>]

On 10/05/16 01:44 PM, Viacheslav Usov wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Michal Kottman 
> <michal.kottman@gmail.com <mailto:michal.kottman@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > The "mechanism" for your "policy" is strict.lua or any other 
> implementation thereof.
>
> Not really.
>
> My policy is to guarantee that there are /no/ problems related to 
> mistyped identifiers. Not just /this/ time I run my program, but 
> /every/ time I run it.
>
> As far as I can tell, I /cannot/ represent that as a user-defined 
> "policy", so your justification is not valid.
>
> I know that I could achieve that by using a language /different /from 
> Lua. But I'd like to achieve that in Lua, and so I want to to 
> understand why it is not possible.
>
> Cheers,
> V.
So in other words you want explicit upvalue syntax? Upvalues as part of 
function signatures? Yeah me too! But I want it with defined order so my 
loadx lib[1] becomes more useful.

[1]: https://github.com/SoniEx2/loadx

--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.