[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: explicit mode
- From: "Soni L." <fakedme@...>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:51:21 -0300
On 10/05/16 01:44 PM, Viacheslav Usov wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Michal Kottman
<email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>> wrote:
So in other words you want explicit upvalue syntax? Upvalues as part of
function signatures? Yeah me too! But I want it with defined order so my
loadx lib becomes more useful.
> The "mechanism" for your "policy" is strict.lua or any other
My policy is to guarantee that there are /no/ problems related to
mistyped identifiers. Not just /this/ time I run my program, but
/every/ time I run it.
As far as I can tell, I /cannot/ represent that as a user-defined
"policy", so your justification is not valid.
I know that I could achieve that by using a language /different /from
Lua. But I'd like to achieve that in Lua, and so I want to to
understand why it is not possible.
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.