[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: The hypothetical __serialize metamethod (was Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4)
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 18:54:23 +0200
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@trms.com> wrote:
> JSON is almost always fine, but if I'm reaching for something that I'm going
> to use in a Lua <=> Lua scenario, I'd want a better fit.
LTON Lua Table Object Notation - pronounced 'elton'. [1]
And Mr Highland agrees - Lua has strong roots as a data description language.
There could exist a binary compact version of [1], of course.
steve d.
[1] Found a ref here but this is not the original:
http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2013-08/msg00263.html . A suitably
restricted parser may be called John if necessary.
- References:
- Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4, Rena
- Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4, Andrew Starks
- The hypothetical __serialize metamethod (was Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4), Sean Conner
- Re: The hypothetical __serialize metamethod (was Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4), Coda Highland
- RE: The hypothetical __serialize metamethod (was Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4), Thijs Schreijer
- Re: The hypothetical __serialize metamethod (was Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4), Coda Highland
- RE: The hypothetical __serialize metamethod (was Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4), Thijs Schreijer
- RE: The hypothetical __serialize metamethod (was Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4), Rena
- RE: The hypothetical __serialize metamethod (was Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4), Thijs Schreijer
- Re: The hypothetical __serialize metamethod (was Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4), Andrew Starks
- Re: The hypothetical __serialize metamethod (was Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4), Sean Conner
- Re: The hypothetical __serialize metamethod (was Re: [ANN] luaproc 1.0-4), Andrew Starks