lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On 02/02/2015 11:45, Sean Conner wrote:
It was thus said that the Great Enrico Tassi once stated:

This choice is what should be standardized.
lua5.1 or lua-5.1 or lua51 or ... A stupid separator character
may make your script fail to run on a system that uses a different

   I think best overall would be:

	lua-50	(if it's still around)

   That way, you won't run afoul of systems that use '.' to separate the main
file name from the extension (cough MS-DOS cough), and the name stil fits in
eight characters (cough MS-DOS cough).  I doubt we'll get to Lua 51.0 any
time soon ...

Seriously? Who run Lua on a MS-Dos box these days?
The time of 8.3 is over, fortunately.

I have no problem with files like


on Windows for years, now. :-)

Philippe Lhoste
--  (near) Paris -- France
--  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --