[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:11:30 -0300
> Yes, but in practise all linux users would hate me for shipping Lua when
> their system already has it
I don't think so.
See http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2014-05/msg00381.html which is about
updating Lua via shared libraries and why we don't think that's warranted.
In summary, Lua is not a critical component in an OS: it is meant to be
embedded, not update system-wide, which may break some apps.
- References:
- Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors, Jonas Thiem
- Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors, David Heiko Kolf
- Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors, Jonas Thiem
- Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors, Jonas Thiem
- Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors, William Ahern
- Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors, Jonas Thiem
- Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors, Coda Highland
- Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors, Jonas Thiem