[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua [in]security and the distributors
- From: Jonas Thiem <jonasthiem@...>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:56:47 +0200
Right, that explains some stuff.
Enrico, sorry I blamed the distributors (which includes you?) so
publicly, it is just a bit sad to see how something published in April
2013 is still unfixed everywhere.
As you can see, I already mailed some distributions but not all of
them, since I am also trying to raise awareness about possible issues
with the information politics here. (the Lua website not having
security announcements mainly)
There was no valid reason for getting harsh on the distributors, after
all I guess it is a voluntary effort too. Sorry!
Regards,
Jonas Thiem
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Pierre Chapuis <catwell@archlinux.us> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Enrico Tassi <gares@fettunta.org> wrote:
>
>> What about you HELP me emailing everyone instead of accusing me of
>> being a troll? At least *I* have already checked distributions and
>> mailed some of them, have you? (And I brought it up here after all)
>> Sorry that I haven't emailed the whole world myself yet.
>
> Just so you understand the context: Enrico maintains the
> Lua package in Debian.
>
>