[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Pooling of strings is good
- From: William Ahern <william@...>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:09:31 -0700
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 02:54:52AM +0200, Robert Virding wrote:
> OK, so the garbage collector will remove all strings from the "string
> table" which aren't being referenced somewhere else? Regarding you last
> paragraph about the removal of the generational collector: why was this
> done as a generational collector is generally more efficient at the cost of
> using more memory? I missed this discussion.
See this thread: http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2012-09/msg00094.html
- References:
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Robert Virding
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Robert Virding
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, William Ahern
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Robert Virding