[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Speed of Lua's immutable strings vs buffers (split from Re: Pooling of strings is good)
- From: Coroutines <coroutines@...>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:31:06 -0700
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Sean Conner <sean@conman.org> wrote:
> Sure, on the client side. On the server side, there is no UDP equivalent
> of listen(). Yes, you can use recv() only on the server side, but then you
> remove any chance of sending back a reply (note: this applies to UDP).
I believe this is still done with connect() to write()/send() to the
associated peer.
- References:
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Philipp Janda
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Speed of Lua's immutable strings vs buffers (split from Re: Pooling of strings is good), Sean Conner
- Re: Speed of Lua's immutable strings vs buffers (split from Re: Pooling of strings is good), Coroutines
- Re: Speed of Lua's immutable strings vs buffers (split from Re: Pooling of strings is good), Sean Conner
- Re: Speed of Lua's immutable strings vs buffers (split from Re: Pooling of strings is good), Coroutines
- Re: Speed of Lua's immutable strings vs buffers (split from Re: Pooling of strings is good), Sean Conner