[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:18:36 -0300
> An interesting presentation of the "why restrict ourselves" position
> is here [1]. There is a pretty example of idiomatic Fortress code in
> full flight, which is very readable if you are a mathematician. (The
> author also makes the point that regular expressions would have no
> need for escapes if the basic elements of the grammar were some other
> Unicode characters.)
"Other" from what? How would you manipulate a pattern with patterns?
-- Roberto
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Tony Papadimitriou
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, David Demelier
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Andrew Starks
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, steve donovan