[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: David Demelier <demelier.david@...>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 13:44:52 +0200
2014-04-25 14:57 GMT+02:00 steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Coroutines <coroutines@gmail.com> wrote:
>> How is <> used in Pascal?
>
> It is "not equal".
>
>> Also, I would like to see ~= changed to !=.
>
> Apparently ~ is a bitch to type on some keyboards, so allowing it as
> an alternative might be an idea (Moonscript does this [1])
>
I also would like to have != instead of ~=. For many reasons, first
because ~= usually mean "approximatively" and because almost all
popular languages use !=. A beginner programmer will confuse when he
will first see ~=. I don't think there are real reasons to keep this
operator :-).
>> I'd be in favor of not allowing it at the beginning of an identifier, yes :>
>
> Ah, but that's exactly where people will want to use it - so they can
> do JQuery in Lua ;)
>
> [1] leaf has collected just about every rejected feature from lua-l
> and rolled them into his own language. It actually works pretty well,
> although I still dislike \ for method calls.
>
--
Demelier David
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Paul Merrell
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Paige DePol
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Dirk Laurie
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Tony Papadimitriou
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, steve donovan