[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@...>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:15:28 -0500
On Sunday, April 27, 2014, Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@gmail.com> wrote:
2014-04-26 13:44 GMT+02:00 David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com>:
> I also would like to have != instead of ~=. For many reasons, first
> because ~= usually mean "approximatively" and because almost all
> popular languages use !=. A beginner programmer will confuse when he
> will first see ~=. I don't think there are real reasons to keep this
> operator :-).
Yes, ~= is confusing if your first language was C, but != is ugly.
I prefer ≠ which is pretty and not confusing.
No joke: Panorama Sheets (a way better approach to FileMaker than FileMaker) had in their user manual to type the ≠ for inequality, as of about 18 months ago.
It turned out to be for an older Mac OS 7 version, but I think its funny in any decade.
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Tony Papadimitriou
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, David Demelier
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Dirk Laurie