[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Paige DePol <lual@...>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 20:39:05 -0500
On Apr 26, 2014, at 5:48 PM, Thiago L. <fakedme@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Saturday, April 26, 2014, Paige DePol <lual@serfnet.org> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting post, however, it does not really address why the architects of Lua chose ~= over != or <> for their "not equals" operator.
>>
>> Also, as that post did talk about patches adding bugs, all patches I am creating for Lunia are also patching the Lua test suite to include the new changes, which has helped considerably with ensuring the patches are as robust and bug-free as possible! :)
>>
>> ~pmd~
>
> I wonder why they don't use "not =" so like "if x not = y then <stuff> end" :3
In that case I would prefer "if x not equal y then <stuff> end" ;)
~pmd~
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Tony Papadimitriou
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, David Demelier
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Paige DePol
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Andrew Starks
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Paige DePol
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Thiago L.