[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Paul Merrell <marbux@...>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 05:28:51 -0700
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 4:44 AM, David Demelier
<demelier.david@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also would like to have != instead of ~=. For many reasons, first
> because ~= usually mean "approximatively" and because almost all
> popular languages use !=. A beginner programmer will confuse when he
> will first see ~=. I don't think there are real reasons to keep this
> operator :-).
Isn't not breaking tons of existing scripts a "real" reason?
Best regards,
Paul
--
[Notice not included in the above original message: The U.S. National
Security Agency neither confirms nor denies that it intercepted this
message.]
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Tony Papadimitriou
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, David Demelier
- Prev by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by Date:
Re: Proposals that didn't work (was Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers)
- Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Index(es):