[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Coroutines <coroutines@...>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 07:05:04 -0700
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Gavin Wraith <gavin@wra1th.plus.com> wrote:
> As RISC OS stands rather
> isolated among operating systems, so RiscLua has more freedom to go
> its own way. Thus (in the environment of the riscos library)
> "![addr] = word, ?[addr] = byte and $[addr] = string" pretty much
> correspond to BBC Basic's "!addr% = word%, ?addr% = byte% and
> $addr% = string$".
Andrew was asking about usage data in another reply to this thread,
have you (all?) had much trouble allowing these characters in
identifiers? Has it caused serious confusion anywhere?
I said in another message I'd hoped these would not be allowed at the
beginning of an identifier (my preference, though).
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Peter Hickman
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Gavin Wraith
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Philipp Janda
- Prev by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Index(es):