[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Coroutines <coroutines@...>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 07:02:27 -0700
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:25 AM, steve donovan
<steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are some (limited) conventions, so that a sort() method works
> in-place, sorted() returns a sorted copy. If English were a
> highly-inflected language like Latin, we could have great fun using
> various verb forms.
That... was not immediately obvious to me :> I have not seen that
convention... I do wish I knew Latin -- it seems to have its root in
most languages.
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, steve donovan
- Prev by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Index(es):