[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Gavin Wraith <gavin@...>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:57:17 +0100
In message <CAG4ptLjW96PHhX5EYk-CyrSm463jk_UpX0qHgjfumfbUvV4_PA@mail.g
mail.com>
Coroutines <coroutines@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Gavin Wraith <gavin@wra1th.plus.com> wrote:
>> As RISC OS stands rather
>> isolated among operating systems, so RiscLua has more freedom to go
>> its own way. Thus (in the environment of the riscos library)
>> "![addr] = word, ?[addr] = byte and $[addr] = string" pretty much
>> correspond to BBC Basic's "!addr% = word%, ?addr% = byte% and
>> $addr% = string$".
> Andrew was asking about usage data in another reply to this thread,
> have you (all?) had much trouble allowing these characters in
> identifiers? Has it caused serious confusion anywhere?
None as far as RiscLua is concerned.
Standard Lua is the intersection of all its extensions. Good
therefore to keep it minimal.
--
Gavin Wraith
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Gavin Wraith
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Prev by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Index(es):