[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Request for clarification on reserved names
- From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:39:30 +0200
2014-04-25 14:34 GMT+02:00 Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@tecgraf.puc-rio.br>:
>> 2014-04-25 12:20 GMT+02:00 Coroutines <coroutines@gmail.com>:
>>
>> > If anything, allowing 'end' and similar
>> > keywords used with the table.member syntax doesn't sound like a big
>> > re-engineering effort.
>>
>> The point of my earlier remark, that 'end' etc is already caught by the
>> lexer at the same stage as two-character operators, before the
>> parser itself gets a chance, was precisely to emphasize that it would
>> be a major re-engineering effort.
>
> Not at all major. See
> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2012-03/msg00309.html
> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2009-01/msg00064.html
You don't have to be a Lua expert of 20 year's standing to do things
like these, but it does help. Awesome!
- References:
- Request for clarification on reserved names, Hisham
- RE: Request for clarification on reserved names, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Hisham
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Coroutines
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, steve donovan
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Coroutines
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo