lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Chapuis <>
> wrote:
>> If we adopt the convention I was proposing that the name
>> of the package in LuaRocks should be the top-level thing
>> we require, we already have that centralized authority :)
> Of course, most LR packages don't follow this convention.  So that
> horse has bolted already.

We have fewer than 350 modules in LuaRocks.
Fixing them all is doable if you ask me.

The rockspec format will change soon anyway,
so if we want to clean up this kind of things
now would be a good moment to decide it.

Pierre Chapuis