[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: nanomsg binding?
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:00:23 +0200
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@trms.com> wrote:
> ZeroMQ felt "lua-esque" to me. NanoMSG makes ZeroMQ feel like a bloated pig.
That _is_ cool. What kind of Lua data is it easy to pass around?
(I remember reading somewhere that some of the ZeroMQ people felt that
using C++ was a mistake, at least for a library that's meant to be
used outside the C++ ecosystem. I'm all for preferring C for basic
infrastructure)
