[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Is having lua_State per thread safe?
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:22:29 -0300
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Roberto Ierusalimschy
> <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> >
> > Yes :-( (Well, for this particular case Lua 5.2 uses gmtime_r when
> > possible. But some other C functions still have problems.)
> >
>
> Ah, great. Will those kind of fixes be backported into Lua 5.1.x ?
I do not think so. But I think that with a few defines you should be
able to use the os lib from 5.2 with Lua 5.1.
-- Roberto
- References:
- Is having lua_State per thread safe?, Tezduyar Lindskog, Umut
- Re: Is having lua_State per thread safe?, Erik Hougaard
- Re: Is having lua_State per thread safe?, Patrick Rapin
- RE: Is having lua_State per thread safe?, Tezduyar Lindskog, Umut
- Re: Is having lua_State per thread safe?, Szymon Gatner
- Re: Is having lua_State per thread safe?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Is having lua_State per thread safe?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Is having lua_State per thread safe?, Ignacio Burgueño
- Re: Is having lua_State per thread safe?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Is having lua_State per thread safe?, Ignacio Burgueño