Re: qOOP - Quick Object Oriented Programming

[KHMan <keinhong@...>]

On 3/31/2012 2:38 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:24:44 +0800
> KHMan wrote:
>
> > On 3/30/2012 6:59 PM, Ousmane Roland Yonaba wrote:
> > > Sorry...
> > > I've posted it on Pastebin...so that everybody can see the source
> > > code easily... Link: http://pastebin.com/SM7bmWk2
> >
> > Anyone can sit down and write an OOP thingy in a short time.
> > Similar methods of doing OOP in Lua surely can be hacked out by a
> > great many other people, hence, a more permissive license than GPL
> > is more appropriate. (But of course, it is your right to slap
> > whatever license you want on it.)
> >
> > This is a thing that is readily reproducible by a person of skill
> > in Lua. Someone is sure to do something similar. A GPLed game for
> > instance I have no issues with, but a wee bit of code surely does
> > not need a gold-plated label?
> >
> > Putting a GPL label on the download is a sure way for a lot of us
> > to avoid it like plague. You should have marked the pastebin stuff
> > as GPL too, if you were properly ethical about such things.
>
> KHMan, why are you so angry?

You're tagging incorrect labels on me. Slander! "Merely amused by 
sloppiness" ~= "angry". Also I have overdosed on Black Adder, but 
unfortunately its style goes *whooosh* over many cultures. :-)

> I actually agree with you that for simple
> stuff the MIT license is better, but questioning the guy's ethics
> because he left the license off a pastebin? [snip]

Anyone who's put up projects on hosting sites would have had to 
deal with choosing licenses. Sloppy. Sloppy. Sloppy.

P.S. :-) :-) :-p

--
Cheers,
Kein-Hong Man (esq.)
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia