 |
lua-l archive |
|
|
||
|
luawhatnow? that actually works? I'll be damned.In my head luajit is a lua compiler, do I have that right? Shouldn't be any reason it wouldn't work as long as the calling conventions are flying in formation.
Sure I'll see what I can do. luajit is released in source form, yes? should be able to get to the bottom of the segfault-on-exit.. in fact there is an excellent chance I've already fixed it. As for the luajit2 thing, my gut is something is binary-incompatible. who knows.
Sure I'll support luajit if I can. (and I would not say no to a little help/guidance)
-Curt On 2/15/2012 4:30 AM, Michal Kolodziejczyk wrote:
On 14.02.2012 17:42, curt wrote:$ lua require_test.lua with tuna.so "findable" works fine on my box (tm)Works great on my box (archlinux 32 bit) with plain lua. With luajit 1.1.7 I get: $ luajit require_test.lua into test about to sleep done sleeping spam.. spam.. spam.. spam.. spam.. Segmentation fault With luajit 2.0.0-beta9 I get: $ luajit2 require_test.lua into test Segmentation fault Would it be possible to get it working with luajit also? Anyways, looking forward to using tuna as a module! Regards, miko