Re: Panda Bears will die, Sloths will live on

["Patrick Mc(avery" <patrick@...>]

On 11-10-19 04:51 AM, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
> Can we have this thread die please? I detest the subject header as
> extraorinary nonsensitive towards Pandas or biodiversity. Biomass is
> first a redicolous meassurement since some livingforms have much
> higher throughput of food and thus need more food but have less
> biomass (as in terms of "sucessful". Also humans are superceded in
> biomass by many species, so what? Thrown into this is neoliberal
> marketing speech into a biology analogy to make this reasoning even
> more redicolous.
Hi Axel

I wrote this in a moment of near despair, I should have known better 
that it would be offensive to some.

I apologize-Patrick