[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching
- From: Leo Razoumov <slonik.az@...>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:37:27 -0500
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 06:43, KHMan <keinhong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sorry to barge in, it is a worrying difference. One thing is bugging me:
>>> Is the C code running SSE2? IIRC gcc -O2 does not normally enable SSE2.
>>
>
> Checked the gcc 4.5.2 docs, AFAICT there is still a generic behaviour and
> it's not "-march=native". Still need to explicitly enable SSE2 if the
> compiler was not built with --with-fpmath=sse or something like that.
>
Or simply pass gcc option "-msse2".
--Leo--
- References:
- LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Florian Weimer
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, KHMan
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Miles Bader
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, KHMan