Re: [ANN} Unofficial Lua FAQ 1.7

[steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>]

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Alex Bradbury <asb@asbradbury.org> wrote:
> On 13 December 2010 13:51, steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's up at the new shiny address:
>>
>> http://www.luafaq.org/
>
> In section 4.2, you give a dead link to an IUP tutorial:
> http://penlight.luaforge.net/iupx. In that same section, I'm not sure
> if it's worth linking to lqt on Github (and maybe even ltcltk as
> well). I know they're listed on the wiki link, but it seems valuable
> to point out that all of the major GUI libraries now have Lua
> bindings.
>
> The capitalisation in both the FAQ and the gotcha headings seems
> rather odd to me.
>
> The inability to yield across pcalls and metamethods seems worthy of a
> mention on the gotchas page if not the FAQ (along with a link to Coco
> and maybe the RVM patch).
>
> The Lua 5.2 section of the FAQ does not detail everything listed under
> 'main changes' http://www.lua.org/work/doc/ e.g. ephemeron tables,
> light C functions and emergency GC. Maybe not all of these should be
> detailed in the FAQ, but a link could instead be given to another
> source (such as LuaFiveTwo on the wiki).
>
> "Creative Commons License" is not a license declaration. We need to
> know which of the CC license restrictions you have chosen, for
> instance CC-BY-SA.
>
> Thanks for the effort - the gotchas list is a great addition.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
>