|
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:Yes, one could say {f()...} if you wanted to be explicit, but {f()}
> That wouldn't be necessary, the new syntax wouldn't break old code.
would still behave the same way.
There is the possibility of confusion where ... is used in two very
different ways:
function varargs(f,...)
return {f(...)...,...}
end
steve d.