|
On 11/21/2010 03:12 AM, HyperHacker wrote:
I'm wondering why they can't just be named "and", "or" etc. Can the compiler not be made to recognize that the "or" in "bit32.or" is an identifier rather than a keyword (which wouldn't be syntactically valid)?
I would much prefer that as well, but I do not see how it makes a lot of difference in this case, as surely when you need bitops, the first thing you do is local band = bit32.AND Best wishes, Taco