Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available

[dcharno <dcharno@...>]

On 11/19/2010 01:57 PM, Alexander Gladysh wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 20:59, Ralph Hempel<rhempel@bmts.com>  wrote:
> > Nick Gammon wrote:
> > If you are at all flexible on the names, then I prefer bit.band over
> > bit.AND
>
> If I remember correctly (perhaps I'm wrong), 5.2 bitlib semantics is
> significantly different from established one.
>
> This is the good reason to keep function names different.

This is the reason you make your module name different.  It is not a 
good reason to CAPTIALIZE a FUNCTION name.