[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: RE: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available
- From: Cuero Bugot <cbugot@...>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 05:42:01 -0800
>That was my guess too, but it would seem that band, bor, bxor are decent
>alternatives. It is UGLY. If you look at the 5.2 reference index, the
>first things you notice are _VERSION and bit32.XXXX. Here's hoping this
>will change before 5.2 is officially released.
In the same topic, is the '32' (in bit32 library) really relevant ? What happens when somebody hacks/improves bit32 library to deals with 64 bits integers (something that has been done in this very list ;-) )
