Re: Lua: open source or not?

[Henrique Becker <henriquebecker91@...>]

"Open Source" confused with "Open Development"?

Henrique Becker

2010/9/29, Jonathan Castello <twisolar@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Lucas Zawacki <lfzawacki@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In my opnion it should be read like "Lua is not like the average
>> open-source projects" because of the reasons stated right after the
>> "misleading" line. Anyway, the license (and the freely available code)
>> seem to speak louder than this statement.
>
> It specifically says "Lua is not an open-source project" in one
> breath. I understand what it means, but taken alone, that line can be
> confusing.
>
> ~Jonathan
>
>