Re: Lua: open source or not?

[Jonathan Castello <twisolar@...>]

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Lucas Zawacki <lfzawacki@gmail.com> wrote:
> In my opnion it should be read like "Lua is not like the average
> open-source projects" because of the reasons stated right after the
> "misleading" line. Anyway, the license (and the freely available code)
> seem to speak louder than this statement.

It specifically says "Lua is not an open-source project" in one
breath. I understand what it means, but taken alone, that line can be
confusing.

~Jonathan