Re: Lua: open source or not?

[Lucas Zawacki <lfzawacki@...>]

In my opnion it should be read like "Lua is not like the average
open-source projects" because of the reasons stated right after the
"misleading" line. Anyway, the license (and the freely available code)
seem to speak louder than this statement.

2010/9/29 Jonathan Castello <twisolar@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Nick Gammon <nick@gammon.com.au> wrote:
>> Are the words "open source" being used in different ways here?
>
> Personally, I understood it to mean that the official Lua distribution
> is only developed by the core team, but the code itself is free to be
> modified and re-distributed. I think the line from about.html is
> unclear and a little misleading in its use of "open-source".
>
> ~Jonathan
>
>



-- 
http://www.twitter.com/lfzawacki
http://www.linesocode.wordpress.com
http://www.umblag.wordpress.com