[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@...>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:32:29 +0200
* David Kastrup:
> "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@thermofisher.com> writes:
>
>>> You've been using C/C++ too long :)
>> Probably ;).
>
> I don't think that I have seen any C++ style guide encourage anything
> but block local loop variables, written like
>
> for (int i=0; i<j; i++) ...
You'll certainly find style guides which advocate the opposite. There
used to be a time when different compilers had different ideas about
the scope of variables defined this way.
- References:
- non-locals are only sometimes global?, Warlich, Christof
- Re: non-locals are only sometimes global?, steve donovan
- AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Warlich, Christof
- Re: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Peter Odding
- AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Warlich, Christof
- Re: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Peter Odding
- AW: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Warlich, Christof
- Re: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Matthew Wild
- AW: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Warlich, Christof
- Re: AW: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, David Kastrup