[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?
- From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@...>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:49:13 +0100
> > I was (and still am) just a bit curious to lean why it was decided to
> > handle both cases differently, as a programming language is typically
> > easier to learn when having to keep in mind fewer exceptins.
>
> It is not like this has not been discussed to death on this list and the
> Wiki. So nobody else is curious, and you can get up to speed by looking
> at the list archives and the Wiki.
Ok, so sorry for just being someone else having been curious.
- References:
- non-locals are only sometimes global?, Warlich, Christof
- Re: non-locals are only sometimes global?, steve donovan
- AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Warlich, Christof
- Re: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Peter Odding
- AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Warlich, Christof
- Re: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Peter Odding
- AW: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Warlich, Christof
- Re: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Matthew Wild
- AW: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Warlich, Christof
- Re: AW: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, David Kastrup
- AW: AW: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, Warlich, Christof
- Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: non-locals are only sometimes global?, David Kastrup