Re: Bit module function names

[Patrick Donnelly <batrick@...>]

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Stuart P. Bentley <stuart@testtrack4.com> wrote:
> Isn't it a bit silly/redundant to prefix all of the functions in the 'bit'
> table with 'b'? After all, the 'string' module functions in the table don't
> start with 'str'. (I understand the need to distinguish 'and' and 'or' from
> the keywords, but they usually have a bitwise qualifier in regular speech as
> well, unlike "bitwise XOR".)

You really want to see bit["or"], bit["and"], etc. in all the code you
read? (Hint: no one else does :P)

-- 
- Patrick Donnelly