Re: GSL Shell software announcement

[David Manura <dm.lua@...>]

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:35 AM, steve donovan wrote:
> 1) It would be cool if lgsl were available as a regular Lua module,
> but it does require a LNUM-complex patched Lua.  Perhaps if it used
> something like lhf's lcomplex, it could be more generally used?

The LNUM stuff is causing some deployment hurdles on LuaDist.  We can
probably handle the patched Lua, but then we run into the issue that
while MinGW provides complex.h, Cygwin and MSVC do not.  It would be
nice to have a switch to turn that off.