[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Next Version of Lua? (__setindex metamethod)
- From: David Manura <dm.lua@...>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:41:51 -0400
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Mark Hamburg wrote:
> With regard to __setindex ...
Something I haven't been entirely comfortable with metatables is how
they don't completely virtualize indexing. You have an index and then
you have a raw index. Some operations index their arguments; others
raw index. The proposed __pairs/__ipairs/__len (__next?) in 5.2
overcome some problems though.
- References:
- Next Version of Lua?, Olivier Hamel
- Re: Next Version of Lua?, Jim Whitehead II
- Re: Next Version of Lua?, Olivier Hamel
- Re: Next Version of Lua?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Next Version of Lua? (again, \x## notation), Ico
- Re: Next Version of Lua? (again, \x## notation), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Next Version of Lua? (__iter metamethod), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Next Version of Lua? (__iter metamethod), Adrian Sietsma
- Re: Next Version of Lua? (__setindex metamethod), Mark Hamburg
