[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: LuaSocket 3.0 ?
- From: Matthew Wild <mwild1@...>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:47:00 +0000
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Diego Nehab <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> If there is a significant improvement, I don't see a
>>> reason not to add the feature. The arguments would have
>>> to come in as two additional at the end of the list, so
>>> as not to kill performance.
> I meant "so as not to kill compatibility", of course. :)
Strangely that's how I read it ;)