Re: LuaSocket 3.0 ?

[Diego Nehab <diego@...>]

Hi,

> > If there is a significant improvement, I don't see a
> > reason not to add the feature. The arguments would have
> > to come in as two additional at the end of the list, so
> > as not to kill performance.
>
> Agreed.

I meant "so as not to kill compatibility", of course. :)

[]s,
Diego