[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Update on status of mod_wombat
- From: "Andre Carregal" <carregal@...>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:17:57 -0200
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Brian McCallister <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Jan Schütze <JanS@dracoblue.de> wrote:
>> But users will barely search for modwombat if they try to get a mod_lua.
>> First time I searched for it, I found the svn-folder of kepler which did not
>> really works at all. mod_lua is what one expects and fits nicely in the
>> default module-naming.
> Agreed, the problem arises from their being 37 extent projects named mod_lua.
> Personally, I prefer mod_lua.
AFAIAC, Kepler's mod_lua is no longer supported and mod_wombat would
be a great successor for it. From my point of view, feel free to use
"mod_lua" if you want.
Of course some other "mod_lua" may be against this... :o)