Re: Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?

lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?
From: "Luís Eduardo Jason Santos" <jasonsantos@...>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 20:19:29 -0300

I second that. LuaJIT needs a little support on windows distribuition, and looks like LfW is in the right position to offer that.

Luís Eduardo Jason Santos

On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Mark Hamburg <mark@grubmah.com> wrote:

While we're engaged in LfW wishes, any thoughts about moving to LuaJIT?

Mark

References:
- [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4.18 Released, RJP Computing
- Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4.18 Released, Linker
- Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4.18 Released, Mark Meijer
- Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?, Matt Campbell
- Re: Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?, Andrew Wilson
- Re: Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?, Mark Hamburg

Prev by Date: Observer design pattern implementation
Next by Date: Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?
Previous by thread: Re: Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?
Next by thread: Re: Lua for Windows: Why not use LuaRocks instead?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread