Re: Weird embedded literal number/compiler issue

[Tim Maxwell <timmaxw@...>]

Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo wrote:

> > > I started writing one such tool but never finished because it was  
> > > too
> > > complicated to cater for all needs.
> >
> > What needs did you see? It seems to me that number format conversion
> > is the main issue.
>
> See this thead: http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2005-06/msg00019.html

I'm considering writing a cross-compiler according to the  
requirements outlined in http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2005-06/ 
msg00048.html. It wouldn't be a drop-in replacement for ldump.c,  
because it would need to take an extra parameter for the cross- 
compilation info. Probably a "lua_DumpFormat *"...

http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2005-06/msg00083.html mentions that  
ChunkSpy can do some chunk rewriting. In light of this, is there  
still any use for a cross-compiler?

Tim Maxwell