[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: CMake and Lua
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:33:13 -0200
> I was just making the *general* observation that tool builders should
> think twice before creating their own language, however minimal their
> needs of the moment are, because users will inevitably ask more of it
> than the author originally intended. Lua's entire reason for existence.
That's exactly what happened with Lua precursors, Sol and DEL, as described
in the HOPL paper.
- References:
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, KHMan
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, E. Wing
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, Eric Tetz
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, Eric Tetz
- Re: CMake and Lua, Jean-Claude Wippler
- Re: CMake and Lua, Eric Tetz