[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Reference counting again
- From: Ketmar Dark <ketmar@...>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:28:14 +0300
hello, Matt Campbell <email@example.com>.
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:49:31 -0500
Matt Campbell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> interface, part of Microsoft Active Accessibility. If such an object
> has a buggy implementation, then holding a reference to that object
> after the corresponding UI element has gone away could lead to a
> crash when the appropriate __gc metamethod finally releases that
do not keep references to `dead' objects, or do not let 'em go away. or
implement `proxy layer' which will take care about such cases. there's
no much sense in changing Lua core (and introducing bugs in it %-) just
to work with another buggy code, i think.